可以看实战的直播APP|新金银梅5一10普通话|国产精品视频一区|YELLOW在线观看高清视频免费|久久久一区二区三区|天天躁躁水汪汪人碰人|PornHub官网

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

用微信登錄

掃一掃,用微信登錄

手機號碼,快捷登錄

查看: 6462|回復: 18
打印 上一主題 下一主題

Wind blade chord and twist angle optimization

[復制鏈接]
樓主
跳轉到指定樓層
發表于 2009-3-20 20:05:24 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
This paper shows a method to obtain optimal chord and twist distributions in wind
turbine blades by using genetic algorithms. The distributions are computed to maximize
the mean expected power depending on theWeibull wind distribution at a specific
site because in wind power systems optimization is highly site dependent [1]. This approach
avoids assumptions about optimal attack angle related to the ratio between the
lift to drag coefficients.
Genetic algorithms are global optimizers that have a wide trade-off between exploration
and explotation on the space problem. The geometry definition of a wind
blade is a problem with many degrees of freedom being suitable to fall in local optima,
which can be surpassed using evolutionary methods. Evolutionary Algorithms
are frequently used as powerful optimization methods. They are stochastic methods
inspired in the natural process of evolution[2, 3], and among their advantages are their
global search due to the management of a population of candidate solutions instead
only one, and also the only requirement of the knowledge of the fitness function value
to perform a evolutionary optimization, without any other consideration such as derivability
or continuity of the function. Many different optimum design problems in
multiple fields of sciences and engineering have been solved outperforming any other
previous results with evolutionary algorithms [4].
To optimize chord and twist distributions, an efficient implementation of the Blade-
Element and Momentum(BEM) theory [1, 5, 6] is used. It is basically a simplified
theory that is used routinely by wind power industry because it provides reasonably
accurate prediction of performance. The BEM theory has shown to give good accuracy
with respect to time cost, and at moderate wind speeds, it has sufficed for blade
geometry optimization.
In the implementation of BEM, the sophistication is dismiss to reduce computational
cost. The time required to evaluate the forces in a typical turbine is in the order
of milliseconds, which allows massive evaluation of trial turbines. The implementation
is validated by comparing power prediction with the experimental data of the

Risø test turbine that is one of six experimental turbines widely tested by the IEA. The
data are contained in the Annex XVIII report [7] and in the public database of rotor
performances at the ECN.
High quality in results is obtained until the stall zone, about wind speed of 13m/s
proximately. Predictions are used to compute the mean power that is the fitness function
in the genetic algorithm. The mean power, which is proportional to the annual
generated energy, is obtained by averaging power predictions with the probability obtained
from the Weibull distribution of the specific site. To obtain the optimal blade,
the upper and lower limits of chord and twist are needed as well as an optional upper
limit of the blade area.

Wind blade chord and twist angle optimization.pdf

324 KB, 下載次數: 344

回復

使用道具 舉報

沙發
發表于 2009-5-19 14:45:41 | 只看該作者
twist angle 我一直搞不懂
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

板凳
 樓主| 發表于 2009-5-19 16:23:59 | 只看該作者
最直觀的就是回去打開葉片切割打孔的那張圖紙,以根部界面和葉尖為參照,看葉型的偏離中軸線的角度,

然后即可
(不是距離)
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

地板
 樓主| 發表于 2009-5-19 16:25:13 | 只看該作者
或者是葉型截面圖的那張,里面應該有twist哪一項的。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

5#
發表于 2009-6-5 16:22:58 | 只看該作者
對于葉片的弦長、扭角和相對厚度分布的優化,通常就是葉片的氣動外形優化設計,我正好是做這個的。一般與葉片選擇的翼型族、葉片運行最優葉尖速比有關。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

6#
 樓主| 發表于 2009-6-5 17:26:35 | 只看該作者
陳兄,來說說。你是局內人。

啥時候,咱們在搞漢翔這些東西的時候不用去烏克蘭求人家搞飛機翼型呢?

你認為俺們在大飛機上面翼型會是真正的自主研發還是“借鑒”他人的研究(比如暴力美學締造者--老毛子,據說波音,空客就經常就復雜的空氣動力學問題拋給老毛子,你的觀點呢?)。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

7#
發表于 2009-6-6 10:29:56 | 只看該作者
怎么不能回復帖子了?難道有敏感詞??
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

8#
發表于 2009-6-6 10:36:41 | 只看該作者
吳兄對暴力美學研究比較透徹,呵呵。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

9#
發表于 2009-6-6 10:38:44 | 只看該作者
目前,目前山寨文化深入人心,不過對于大飛機這么敏感的話題,則不敢妄言。實際上,對于空氣動力學方面研究,飛機上應用的翼型研究應該不是什么難點,難點在于整機空氣動力學的研究?我本人一直從事風電機組空氣動力學研究,對于飛機,好像變得一知半解了,不好意思。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

10#
發表于 2009-6-6 10:39:27 | 只看該作者
回到風能領域,有個8 6 3計劃課題,說是要研究我國自主知識產權的風電機組專用翼型族,最后恐怕也是把DU?NREL S或者某個翼型族拿來作作風 洞試 驗了事?等著瞧吧。
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄后才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即注冊   掃一掃,用微信登錄

本版積分規則

QQ|玻璃鋼復合材料商城|聯系我們|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| FRP玻璃鋼復合材料論壇 蜀ICP備10204395號-1

GMT+8, 2026-5-29 01:09 , Processed in 1.152527 second(s), 22 queries .

© 2015-2016

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表